Michelle's+page

​​Hello everyone! Let's talk! comment on my page and I'll comment you back, and we'll have a conversation goin'!

media type="youtube" key="OMmy_h76KE0" height="385" width="480"

Help me reach 200 on my comments, please! So I can beat Antonio....... hahah jk jk jk jk

you mean 300. . . right? Hey!! jk. believe it or not, but the home has 162 comments. (nat a tan ant)

hahaha right! -Michelle

YOU NEVER BEAT ME!!! NEVER!!! (I never said ever) -ant

I wrote a comment on this huge debate. so check it out!!!!!! (ant) ​I wrote another on the bottom. so yeahhhh... look at it.... i think... yeahh.... (Mr. Antonio Ravioli)

I asked my dad about whether he had gone to jury duty or not, and he said that he did. When I asked him the situation, he told me this :

My scenario was a hit-and-run accident involving a policeman and a 2 year old baby in a stroller. The policeman had hit the baby in the stroller in his car and dragged it 30-50 ft. Then, realizing what he had done, he ran away. The baby was severely burned to the point where she had to get surgery, and even after the surgery, she couldn't lift her arm up completely. She also suffered some mental damage. Her parents sued the city because they thought that the city should be responsible for policemen, and so on the day of court, some other policeman went to the suspect and prepared to arrest him. Well, apparently, the policeman (suspect) had comitted suicide. After more investigation, the policeman (suspect) had apparently been part of a retirement party at the night of the accident, so he could have been drunk driving. Should the city be fined and punished? I want to hear your opinion

YEYSEYSYEYSEY!!!! A POLICE'S DUTY IS TO PREVENT DRUNK DRIVING. NOT TO HAVE IT. honestly, the accusers could win the whole jury by just showing the pic of the baby. HE'S GOING TO BE JUDGED HERE AND PROBABLY //there.//

Do you agree with these statements?

Knowledge cannot change people, but people can change knowledge.
I personally don't, but I wanna hear ur opinion!

i think that it depends on whether the person already has knowledge or is getting more and more knowledge. because if the person already had knowledge, and didn't have any desire for more, then the knowledge wouldn't be changing them. not really. because all of the new information would just be stuffed into their mind but it wouldn't change them. not one bit. but people can definetly change knowledge because knowledge doesn't really have a definition. So the person can change what knowledge means all the time, because it //is// always changing and growing. however, for someone young that is learning and learning more and more it is **always** changing them--it changes their point of view and perspective on things. it changes the obvious-how much you know, how much stuff is in your brain and how it affects you. it affects your ability to answer a question such as this one!

-kelly

Check out my alliteration peom, people!


QUESTION!

What does APAAS stand for?

Leena: It stands for: Alternative Program for Academically Accelerated Students.


 * Do you think there should be an APAAS or not?**

FOR SURE. of course there should be an APAAS because if there wasn't where would we be right now? We'd be goofing around in class cause it would be way too ez. And plus I love how we have crazy discussions off topic. remember when we were in Mr. M's class how we started talking about the pledge of allegience and then it ended up us talking about republicans and what not. -WESLEY Also, check your mail! I sent you something! and reply to it! please!

**But wouldn't APAAS make certain people feel like they're not smart because they didn't get in even though they truly are?**
bobo: I don't agree with the knowledge cannot change people part but I do agree with the second part after the comma.

Ant: knowledge can change people by the depth and complexity thing. That just was an example though. People can't change knowledge because it is a fact that we have to face, we might not know the knowledge and can change it our own way we think. We can't change the fact though, which is knowledge. We can only change our knowledge.

Nope your all wrong! JK but i think that knowledge can change people. Let's say hypothetically I could see the future. If I saw that I was going to die young and a slow painful death I'm pretty sure I would be really depressed. that would of changed me because now i would be depressed in stead of happy _WESLEY

Wesley, I'd change my future instead of despairing to a nut. Or if I couldn't, I live my life to the fullest. ==ANTONIO==

I agree with Wesley, because if there was no APPAS we would be stuck inside a boring classroom doing sixth grade math which won't be challenging. My Dad said that when they didn't have advanced classes in England, he zoned out and almost failed his end of the year course. Good thing he brushed up on things he didn't listen to in class. So I am really glad we have a school district that allows us this opportunity. - Tara

I think their should be APAAS. The whole point of APAAS is to have a program for accelerated kids that need to be challenged. Some kids DON'T need to be challenged with the cirriculum presented, and have no need to go into something that isn't right for their level.

Is information the same as knowledge? With knowledge, isn't there also wisdom and awareness? Mrs. M.

True, but couldn't awareness be changed? if more and more countries start to have nuclear weapons, then we have to be aware of those nuclear weapons. So technically, we're changing awareness by adding one more thing that we have to be aware of, right? -Michelle

ACTUALLY.. IT WOULD BE BOTH. IT DEPENDS WHO IS LOOKING AT IT. if you say POV is yourself, then your awareness would be changed yesssss... but then, if you said the POV is the country, the country would be aware from the start. so Michelle and others would be right about that. but then GOD (or whatever supreme being you believe in) would have it all written down. he'd have all the blueprints. there's nothing for him to be aware of because God always knows what's he doing. Actually in one of the verses in the Bible, Jesus was able to cure any sickness (as you may know) and He never did anything without a purpose. So there was this time Jesus was to cure a blind man. So He brought the man out of town and SPAT in his eyes. Then Jesus put His hands on the guy's eyes said, can you see? the guy said, i see but people seem to appear as trees. Jesus put His hands on the guys eyes a second time. and He then said, YES I CAN SEE!!! so you could say Jesus was always aware of the whole thing, and even though I dont know what it is, but Jesus had a reason for spitting in the man's eyes. Which reminds me, ALEX WHY would you LOOK FOR songs? THIS SUPER LONG PARAGRAPH IS WRITTEN BY ANTONIO AND THE MINI CAR

I don't get your Jesus point, Antonio and the mini car -Michelle

Well to explain, I don't think God has been changed by knowledge if he already knows all of it. Same with Jesus. He knew why he spat on the man's eyes, and why it took him twice to recover the guy's eyes. It is the only time in the Bible Jesus had a procedure when healing someone. -rac inim eht dna oinotnA